Head-to-head · 2026
New Jersey Institute of Technology vs Yeshiva Toras Chaim
Compare average net price ($16,504 at New Jersey Institute of Technology; $5,356 at Yeshiva Toras Chaim), ROI score (12.77 vs 29.19), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($84,276 vs $62,526), and admissions selectivity (65.1% acceptance at New Jersey Institute of Technology; 44.3% at Yeshiva Toras Chaim) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.
| Metric | New Jersey Institute of Technology | Yeshiva Toras Chaim |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score (school-wide) | 12.77 | 29.19 ✓ |
| Avg net price | $16,504 | $5,356 ✓ |
| 4-year avg net price | $66,016 | $21,424 ✓ |
| In-state tuition | $19,974 | $12,750 |
| Out-of-state tuition | $37,664 | $12,750 |
| School-wide earnings (10y) | $84,276 ✓ | $62,526 |
| Acceptance rate | 65.1% | 44.3% |
| Graduation rate | 72.8% ✓ | 31% |
| Retention rate | 89.5% | 91.9% ✓ |
| Median debt | $21,000 | — |
| Enrollment | 9,019 | 227 |
| Ownership | Public | Private Non-Profit |
| Avg SAT | 1337 | — |
Cost by family income
Reported net price by income band
Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.
| Income band | New Jersey Institute of Technology | Yeshiva Toras Chaim |
|---|---|---|
| Family income $0–30k | $10,138 | $3,247 ✓ |
| Family income $30–48k | $11,165 | $4,931 ✓ |
| Family income $48–75k | $15,958 | $5,629 ✓ |
| Family income $75–110k | $23,152 | $8,287 ✓ |
| Family income $110k+ | $27,244 | — |
Program fit
Shared fields with reported awards
Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.
No shared field has positive award-share data at both schools in the current federal records. Check each school's official catalog before ruling out a program.
Decision readout
What the differences mean
Yeshiva Toras Chaim reports the lower average net price by $11,148 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $44,592 difference over four years ($21,424 vs $66,016).
New Jersey Institute of Technology reports $21,750 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($84,276 vs $62,526). This is not earnings for a specific major.
First-year retention is 89.5% at New Jersey Institute of Technology and 91.9% at Yeshiva Toras Chaim. Debt data is incomplete for at least one school, so it is not used as a deciding signal here.
The current federal records do not show a shared field with positive award-share data for these schools. That does not prove a program is unavailable; verify offerings with each school.
Keep comparing
Related college comparisons
Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.
Frequently asked
New Jersey Institute of Technology vs Yeshiva Toras Chaim, answered
4 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Which school costs less after aid?
Yeshiva Toras Chaim is cheaper — average net price $5,356 per year vs $16,504 at New Jersey Institute of Technology. The annual difference of $11,148 adds up to about $44,592 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
New Jersey Institute of Technology reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $84,276 vs $62,526 at Yeshiva Toras Chaim. The gap in the federal data is $21,750. This is not major-specific earnings.
Which school is harder to get into?
Yeshiva Toras Chaim is more selective at 44.3% acceptance vs 65.1% at New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Is there an overall winner?
No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.