Head-to-head · 2026
University of Minnesota-Crookston vs White Earth Tribal and Community College
Compare average net price ($12,212 at University of Minnesota-Crookston; $1,811 at White Earth Tribal and Community College), ROI score (11.89 vs 24.91), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($58,056 vs $18,044), and admissions context (87.9% at University of Minnesota-Crookston; Open / not reported at White Earth Tribal and Community College) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.
| Metric | University of Minnesota-Crookston | White Earth Tribal and Community College |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score (school-wide) | 11.89 | 24.91 ✓ |
| Avg net price | $12,212 | $1,811 ✓ |
| 4-year avg net price | $48,848 | $7,244 ✓ |
| In-state tuition | $13,288 | $5,490 |
| Out-of-state tuition | $13,288 | $5,490 |
| School-wide earnings (10y) | $58,056 ✓ | $18,044 |
| Acceptance rate | 87.9% | Open / not reported |
| Graduation rate | 49.8% ✓ | 10% |
| Retention rate | 80% ✓ | 50% |
| Median debt | $20,500 | — |
| Enrollment | 1,729 | 110 |
| Ownership | Public | Private Non-Profit |
| Avg SAT | — | — |
Cost by family income
Reported net price by income band
Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.
| Income band | University of Minnesota-Crookston | White Earth Tribal and Community College |
|---|---|---|
| Family income $0–30k | $5,758 | $2,710 ✓ |
| Family income $30–48k | $6,368 | -$1,483 ✓ |
| Family income $48–75k | $7,587 | — |
| Family income $75–110k | $13,542 | — |
| Family income $110k+ | $19,289 | — |
Program fit
Shared fields with reported awards
Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.
No shared field has positive award-share data at both schools in the current federal records. Check each school's official catalog before ruling out a program.
Decision readout
What the differences mean
White Earth Tribal and Community College reports the lower average net price by $10,401 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $41,604 difference over four years ($7,244 vs $48,848).
University of Minnesota-Crookston reports $40,012 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($58,056 vs $18,044). This is not earnings for a specific major.
First-year retention is 80% at University of Minnesota-Crookston and 50% at White Earth Tribal and Community College. Debt data is incomplete for at least one school, so it is not used as a deciding signal here.
The current federal records do not show a shared field with positive award-share data for these schools. That does not prove a program is unavailable; verify offerings with each school.
Keep comparing
Related college comparisons
Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.
Frequently asked
University of Minnesota-Crookston vs White Earth Tribal and Community College, answered
3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Which school costs less after aid?
White Earth Tribal and Community College is cheaper — average net price $1,811 per year vs $12,212 at University of Minnesota-Crookston. The annual difference of $10,401 adds up to about $41,604 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
University of Minnesota-Crookston reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $58,056 vs $18,044 at White Earth Tribal and Community College. The gap in the federal data is $40,012. This is not major-specific earnings.
Is there an overall winner?
No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.