EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

South Texas College vs Texas A & M International University

Compare average net price ($1,751 at South Texas College; $3,637 at Texas A & M International University), ROI score (52.52 vs 33.26), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($36,788 vs $48,386), and admissions context (Open / not reported at South Texas College; 44.4% at Texas A & M International University) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric South Texas College Texas A & M International University
ROI score (school-wide) 52.52 33.26
Avg net price $1,751 $3,637
4-year avg net price $7,004 $14,548
In-state tuition $4,920 $7,894
Out-of-state tuition $7,620 $19,454
School-wide earnings (10y) $36,788 $48,386
Acceptance rate Open / not reported 44.4%
Graduation rate 27.3% 46.5%
Retention rate 58.5% 77.8%
Median debt $15,000
Enrollment 15,856 6,667
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT 993

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band South Texas College Texas A & M International University
Family income $0–30k $1,395 $3,097
Family income $30–48k $1,651 $2,745
Family income $48–75k $3,841 $3,840
Family income $75–110k $5,274 $4,982
Family income $110k+ $10,697

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field South Texas College Texas A & M International University
Business Administration, Management and Operations 5% 18%
Criminal Justice and Corrections 6.4% 13%
Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing 5.2% 8.4%
Psychology, General 2.6% 9.5%
Biology, General 2.6% 7%
Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Levels and Methods 5.7% 0.4%
Sports, Kinesiology, and Physical Education/Fitness 0.9% 3.4%
English Language and Literature, General 0.3% 2.5%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

South Texas College reports the lower average net price by $1,886 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $7,544 difference over four years ($7,004 vs $14,548).

Texas A & M International University reports $11,598 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($48,386 vs $36,788). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 58.5% at South Texas College and 77.8% at Texas A & M International University. Debt data is incomplete for at least one school, so it is not used as a deciding signal here.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

South Texas College vs Texas A & M International University, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

South Texas College is cheaper — average net price $1,751 per year vs $3,637 at Texas A & M International University. The annual difference of $1,886 adds up to about $7,544 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

Texas A & M International University reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $48,386 vs $36,788 at South Texas College. The gap in the federal data is $11,598. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.