EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Philander Smith University vs University of Arkansas-Fort Smith

Compare average net price ($14,224 at Philander Smith University; $10,574 at University of Arkansas-Fort Smith), ROI score (6.75 vs 9.72), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($38,427 vs $41,102), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Philander Smith University; 80.5% at University of Arkansas-Fort Smith) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Philander Smith University University of Arkansas-Fort Smith
ROI score (school-wide) 6.75 9.72
Avg net price $14,224 $10,574
4-year avg net price $56,896 $42,296
In-state tuition $13,014 $7,334
Out-of-state tuition $13,014 $12,182
School-wide earnings (10y) $38,427 $41,102
Acceptance rate Open / not reported 80.5%
Graduation rate 30.4% 37.9%
Retention rate 65.7% 69.8%
Median debt $24,736 $18,250
Enrollment 751 4,091
Ownership Private Non-Profit Public
Avg SAT 1050

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Philander Smith University University of Arkansas-Fort Smith
Family income $0–30k $13,393 $8,890
Family income $30–48k $14,606 $9,391
Family income $48–75k $16,686 $11,392
Family income $75–110k $12,847 $13,804
Family income $110k+ $15,800 $14,297

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Philander Smith University University of Arkansas-Fort Smith
Business Administration, Management and Operations 25.4% 18.4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections 11.8% 3.4%
Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Levels and Methods 8.9% 5.9%
Psychology, General 11.8% 1.6%
Biology, General 10.1% 2.5%
Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studies and Humanities 2.4% 7.5%
Social Work 6.5% 0.7%
Computer Science 4.7% 1.9%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

University of Arkansas-Fort Smith reports the lower average net price by $3,650 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $14,600 difference over four years ($42,296 vs $56,896).

University of Arkansas-Fort Smith reports $2,675 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($41,102 vs $38,427). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 65.7% at Philander Smith University and 69.8% at University of Arkansas-Fort Smith. Median federal debt among completers is $24,736 vs $18,250, respectively.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Philander Smith University vs University of Arkansas-Fort Smith, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

University of Arkansas-Fort Smith is cheaper — average net price $10,574 per year vs $14,224 at Philander Smith University. The annual difference of $3,650 adds up to about $14,600 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

University of Arkansas-Fort Smith reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $41,102 vs $38,427 at Philander Smith University. The gap in the federal data is $2,675. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.