EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Northern Virginia Community College vs Radford University

Compare average net price ($9,919 at Northern Virginia Community College; $14,578 at Radford University), ROI score (13.50 vs 9.22), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($53,557 vs $53,739), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Northern Virginia Community College; 89.5% at Radford University) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Northern Virginia Community College Radford University
ROI score (school-wide) 13.50 9.22
Avg net price $9,919 $14,578
4-year avg net price $39,676 $58,312
In-state tuition $5,891 $12,548
Out-of-state tuition $12,409 $25,633
School-wide earnings (10y) $53,557 $53,739
Acceptance rate Open / not reported 89.5%
Graduation rate 33.1% 48.7%
Retention rate 70.8% 75.6%
Median debt $11,000 $24,000
Enrollment 33,048 6,038
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT 1060

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Northern Virginia Community College Radford University
Family income $0–30k $7,463 $8,965
Family income $30–48k $8,317 $8,724
Family income $48–75k $10,762 $12,069
Family income $75–110k $13,835 $17,092
Family income $110k+ $16,630 $23,533

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Northern Virginia Community College Radford University
Business Administration, Management and Operations 11.8% 6.1%
Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing 1.6% 11.7%
Psychology, General 1.8% 6.6%
Criminal Justice and Corrections 2.3% 5.1%
Computer/Information Technology Administration and Management 4.2% 1.2%
Computer Science 3.2% 1.8%
Social Sciences, General 4.2% 0.5%
Allied Health Diagnostic, Intervention, and Treatment Professions 0.9% 3.7%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Northern Virginia Community College reports the lower average net price by $4,659 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $18,636 difference over four years ($39,676 vs $58,312).

Radford University reports $182 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($53,739 vs $53,557). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 70.8% at Northern Virginia Community College and 75.6% at Radford University. Median federal debt among completers is $11,000 vs $24,000, respectively.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Northern Virginia Community College vs Radford University, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Northern Virginia Community College is cheaper — average net price $9,919 per year vs $14,578 at Radford University. The annual difference of $4,659 adds up to about $18,636 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

Radford University reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $53,739 vs $53,557 at Northern Virginia Community College. The gap in the federal data is $182. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.