Head-to-head · 2026
Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture vs University of Nebraska at Omaha
Compare average net price ($14,639 at Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture; $13,441 at University of Nebraska at Omaha), ROI score (9.71 vs 10.03), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($56,887 vs $53,909), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture; 87% at University of Nebraska at Omaha) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.
| Metric | Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture | University of Nebraska at Omaha |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score (school-wide) | 9.71 | 10.03 ✓ |
| Avg net price | $14,639 | $13,441 ✓ |
| 4-year avg net price | $58,556 | $53,764 ✓ |
| In-state tuition | $5,926 | $8,718 |
| Out-of-state tuition | $5,926 | $23,206 |
| School-wide earnings (10y) | $56,887 ✓ | $53,909 |
| Acceptance rate | Open / not reported | 87% |
| Graduation rate | 60.8% ✓ | 47.1% |
| Retention rate | 59% | 77.9% ✓ |
| Median debt | $21,000 | $19,000 ✓ |
| Enrollment | 196 | 11,488 |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
| Avg SAT | — | 1120 |
Cost by family income
Reported net price by income band
Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.
| Income band | Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture | University of Nebraska at Omaha |
|---|---|---|
| Family income $0–30k | $11,603 | $10,534 ✓ |
| Family income $30–48k | $11,933 | $10,614 ✓ |
| Family income $48–75k | $15,634 | $12,324 ✓ |
| Family income $75–110k | $16,723 | $15,540 ✓ |
| Family income $110k+ | $18,050 ✓ | $19,466 |
Program fit
Shared fields with reported awards
Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.
No shared field has positive award-share data at both schools in the current federal records. Check each school's official catalog before ruling out a program.
Decision readout
What the differences mean
University of Nebraska at Omaha reports the lower average net price by $1,198 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $4,792 difference over four years ($53,764 vs $58,556).
Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture reports $2,978 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($56,887 vs $53,909). This is not earnings for a specific major.
First-year retention is 59% at Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture and 77.9% at University of Nebraska at Omaha. Median federal debt among completers is $21,000 vs $19,000, respectively.
The current federal records do not show a shared field with positive award-share data for these schools. That does not prove a program is unavailable; verify offerings with each school.
Keep comparing
Related college comparisons
Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.
Frequently asked
Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture vs University of Nebraska at Omaha, answered
3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Which school costs less after aid?
University of Nebraska at Omaha is cheaper — average net price $13,441 per year vs $14,639 at Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture. The annual difference of $1,198 adds up to about $4,792 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $56,887 vs $53,909 at University of Nebraska at Omaha. The gap in the federal data is $2,978. This is not major-specific earnings.
Is there an overall winner?
No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.