EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Lower Columbia College vs Spokane Falls Community College

Compare average net price ($7,630 at Lower Columbia College; $7,409 at Spokane Falls Community College), ROI score (13.33 vs 13.14), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($40,691 vs $38,955), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Lower Columbia College; Open / not reported at Spokane Falls Community College) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Lower Columbia College Spokane Falls Community College
ROI score (school-wide) 13.33 13.14
Avg net price $7,630 $7,409
4-year avg net price $30,520 $29,636
In-state tuition $4,626 $5,461
Out-of-state tuition $6,003 $6,612
School-wide earnings (10y) $40,691 $38,955
Acceptance rate Open / not reported Open / not reported
Graduation rate 23.4% 32%
Retention rate
Median debt $10,506 $12,000
Enrollment 1,932 3,199
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Lower Columbia College Spokane Falls Community College
Family income $0–30k $6,078 $4,477
Family income $30–48k $7,069 $7,473
Family income $48–75k $9,483 $8,274
Family income $75–110k $10,482 $13,377
Family income $110k+ $14,192 $14,825

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Lower Columbia College Spokane Falls Community College
Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studies and Humanities 47.9% 54.2%
Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Levels and Methods 4.7% 13.2%
Allied Health and Medical Assisting Services 3.6% 2.6%
Business Administration, Management and Operations 3.3% 2.1%
Business/Commerce, General 1.6% 2.6%
Mental and Social Health Services and Allied Professions 0.7% 2.5%
Computer/Information Technology Administration and Management 0.7% 2.3%
Biology, General 1% 1.8%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Spokane Falls Community College reports the lower average net price by $221 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $884 difference over four years ($29,636 vs $30,520).

Lower Columbia College reports $1,736 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($40,691 vs $38,955). This is not earnings for a specific major.

Retention data is incomplete for at least one school. Compare the available graduation, debt, price and admissions context without treating a missing field as an advantage.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Lower Columbia College vs Spokane Falls Community College, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Spokane Falls Community College is cheaper — average net price $7,409 per year vs $7,630 at Lower Columbia College. The annual difference of $221 adds up to about $884 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

Lower Columbia College reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $40,691 vs $38,955 at Spokane Falls Community College. The gap in the federal data is $1,736. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.