EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Lane Community College vs Oregon Institute of Technology

Compare average net price ($9,123 at Lane Community College; $15,706 at Oregon Institute of Technology), ROI score (10.43 vs 11.50), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($38,075 vs $72,273), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Lane Community College; 95% at Oregon Institute of Technology) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Lane Community College Oregon Institute of Technology
ROI score (school-wide) 10.43 11.50
Avg net price $9,123 $15,706
4-year avg net price $36,492 $62,824
In-state tuition $6,202 $13,260
Out-of-state tuition $13,078 $37,196
School-wide earnings (10y) $38,075 $72,273
Acceptance rate Open / not reported 95%
Graduation rate 20.4% 53.8%
Retention rate 69%
Median debt $14,761 $22,500
Enrollment 6,064 2,892
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT 1150

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Lane Community College Oregon Institute of Technology
Family income $0–30k $7,555 $9,085
Family income $30–48k $9,165 $8,729
Family income $48–75k $13,517 $14,385
Family income $75–110k $18,925
Family income $110k+ $22,431

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Lane Community College Oregon Institute of Technology
Allied Health Diagnostic, Intervention, and Treatment Professions 1.3% 28.7%
Dental Support Services and Allied Professions 1.7% 7.2%
Health and Medical Administrative Services 3% 1.1%
Business Administration, Management and Operations 1.2% 1.5%
Computer/Information Technology Administration and Management 1.2% 1.4%
Industrial Production Technologies/Technicians 0.7% 1.2%
Accounting and Related Services 0.6% 0.9%
Natural Resources Conservation and Research 0.1% 1.2%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Lane Community College reports the lower average net price by $6,583 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $26,332 difference over four years ($36,492 vs $62,824).

Oregon Institute of Technology reports $34,198 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($72,273 vs $38,075). This is not earnings for a specific major.

Retention data is incomplete for at least one school. Compare the available graduation, debt, price and admissions context without treating a missing field as an advantage.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Lane Community College vs Oregon Institute of Technology, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Lane Community College is cheaper — average net price $9,123 per year vs $15,706 at Oregon Institute of Technology. The annual difference of $6,583 adds up to about $26,332 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

Oregon Institute of Technology reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $72,273 vs $38,075 at Lane Community College. The gap in the federal data is $34,198. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.