EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Johnson County Community College vs Pittsburg State University

Compare average net price ($14,176 at Johnson County Community College; $15,784 at Pittsburg State University), ROI score (8.00 vs 8.01), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($45,387 vs $50,579), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Johnson County Community College; 89.4% at Pittsburg State University) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Johnson County Community College Pittsburg State University
ROI score (school-wide) 8.00 8.01
Avg net price $14,176 $15,784
4-year avg net price $56,704 $63,136
In-state tuition $2,424 $8,400
Out-of-state tuition $5,688 $19,744
School-wide earnings (10y) $45,387 $50,579
Acceptance rate Open / not reported 89.4%
Graduation rate 30.8% 56.6%
Retention rate 71.6% 77.2%
Median debt $8,750 $18,969
Enrollment 11,332 4,210
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT 1050

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Johnson County Community College Pittsburg State University
Family income $0–30k $12,403 $11,968
Family income $30–48k $13,057 $11,453
Family income $48–75k $15,386 $14,676
Family income $75–110k $17,514 $18,873
Family income $110k+ $19,363 $20,237

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Johnson County Community College Pittsburg State University
Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studies and Humanities 41.5% 1.9%
Business Administration, Management and Operations 2% 11.2%
Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing 1.3% 8.7%
Construction Management 0.6% 4.3%
Design and Applied Arts 4% 0.7%
Marketing 0.9% 2.9%
Graphic Communications 0.9% 1.8%
Accounting and Related Services 1% 1.7%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Johnson County Community College reports the lower average net price by $1,608 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $6,432 difference over four years ($56,704 vs $63,136).

Pittsburg State University reports $5,192 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($50,579 vs $45,387). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 71.6% at Johnson County Community College and 77.2% at Pittsburg State University. Median federal debt among completers is $8,750 vs $18,969, respectively.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Johnson County Community College vs Pittsburg State University, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Johnson County Community College is cheaper — average net price $14,176 per year vs $15,784 at Pittsburg State University. The annual difference of $1,608 adds up to about $6,432 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

Pittsburg State University reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $50,579 vs $45,387 at Johnson County Community College. The gap in the federal data is $5,192. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.