Head-to-head · 2026
Hartnell College vs Irvine Valley College
Compare average net price ($2,039 at Hartnell College; $2,090 at Irvine Valley College), ROI score (54.34 vs 58.80), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($44,316 vs $49,156), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Hartnell College; Open / not reported at Irvine Valley College) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.
| Metric | Hartnell College | Irvine Valley College |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score (school-wide) | 54.34 | 58.80 ✓ |
| Avg net price | $2,039 ✓ | $2,090 |
| 4-year avg net price | $8,156 ✓ | $8,360 |
| In-state tuition | $1,404 | $1,156 |
| Out-of-state tuition | $10,374 | $11,860 |
| School-wide earnings (10y) | $44,316 | $49,156 ✓ |
| Acceptance rate | Open / not reported | Open / not reported |
| Graduation rate | 40% | 57.1% ✓ |
| Retention rate | 73.4% | 79.1% ✓ |
| Median debt | — | $6,500 |
| Enrollment | 9,453 | 10,286 |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
| Avg SAT | — | — |
Cost by family income
Reported net price by income band
Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.
| Income band | Hartnell College | Irvine Valley College |
|---|---|---|
| Family income $0–30k | $828 | $734 ✓ |
| Family income $30–48k | $465 ✓ | $785 |
| Family income $48–75k | $3,124 ✓ | $3,941 |
| Family income $75–110k | $6,856 ✓ | $7,906 |
| Family income $110k+ | $9,885 | $9,432 ✓ |
Program fit
Shared fields with reported awards
Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.
| Shared field | Hartnell College | Irvine Valley College |
|---|---|---|
| Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studies and Humanities | 53.6% | 48.9% |
| Business Administration, Management and Operations | 3.7% | 5.7% |
| Psychology, General | 5.6% | 2.2% |
| Accounting and Related Services | 0.2% | 6.9% |
| Criminal Justice and Corrections | 5% | 1.1% |
| Human Development, Family Studies, and Related Services | 2% | 1.9% |
| Mathematics | 1.1% | 2.4% |
| Sociology | 2.7% | 0.4% |
Decision readout
What the differences mean
Hartnell College reports the lower average net price by $51 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $204 difference over four years ($8,156 vs $8,360).
Irvine Valley College reports $4,840 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($49,156 vs $44,316). This is not earnings for a specific major.
First-year retention is 73.4% at Hartnell College and 79.1% at Irvine Valley College. Debt data is incomplete for at least one school, so it is not used as a deciding signal here.
8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.
Keep comparing
Related college comparisons
Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.
Frequently asked
Hartnell College vs Irvine Valley College, answered
3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Which school costs less after aid?
Hartnell College is cheaper — average net price $2,039 per year vs $2,090 at Irvine Valley College. The annual difference of $51 adds up to about $204 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
Irvine Valley College reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $49,156 vs $44,316 at Hartnell College. The gap in the federal data is $4,840. This is not major-specific earnings.
Is there an overall winner?
No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.