EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Great Falls College Montana State University vs University of Providence

Compare average net price ($12,468 at Great Falls College Montana State University; $17,649 at University of Providence), ROI score (7.63 vs 6.84), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($38,034 vs $48,296), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Great Falls College Montana State University; 50.3% at University of Providence) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Great Falls College Montana State University University of Providence
ROI score (school-wide) 7.63 6.84
Avg net price $12,468 $17,649
4-year avg net price $49,872 $70,596
In-state tuition $4,028 $30,448
Out-of-state tuition $12,911 $30,448
School-wide earnings (10y) $38,034 $48,296
Acceptance rate Open / not reported 50.3%
Graduation rate 34.1% 27.9%
Retention rate 55.7% 72.2%
Median debt $18,750
Enrollment 894 528
Ownership Public Private Non-Profit
Avg SAT 980

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Great Falls College Montana State University University of Providence
Family income $0–30k $10,675 $14,257
Family income $30–48k $10,624 $11,616
Family income $48–75k $11,778 $16,802
Family income $75–110k $16,535 $22,545
Family income $110k+ $16,664 $20,676

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Great Falls College Montana State University University of Providence
Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing 8.8% 21%
Health and Medical Administrative Services 6.7% 11.9%
Allied Health and Medical Assisting Services 5.3% 8.1%
Accounting and Related Services 3.9% 0.5%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Great Falls College Montana State University reports the lower average net price by $5,181 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $20,724 difference over four years ($49,872 vs $70,596).

University of Providence reports $10,262 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($48,296 vs $38,034). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 55.7% at Great Falls College Montana State University and 72.2% at University of Providence. Debt data is incomplete for at least one school, so it is not used as a deciding signal here.

4 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Great Falls College Montana State University vs University of Providence, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Great Falls College Montana State University is cheaper — average net price $12,468 per year vs $17,649 at University of Providence. The annual difference of $5,181 adds up to about $20,724 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

University of Providence reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $48,296 vs $38,034 at Great Falls College Montana State University. The gap in the federal data is $10,262. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.