EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Grays Harbor College vs Lower Columbia College

Compare average net price ($4,783 at Grays Harbor College; $7,630 at Lower Columbia College), ROI score (21.36 vs 13.33), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($40,865 vs $40,691), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Grays Harbor College; Open / not reported at Lower Columbia College) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Grays Harbor College Lower Columbia College
ROI score (school-wide) 21.36 13.33
Avg net price $4,783 $7,630
4-year avg net price $19,132 $30,520
In-state tuition $5,593 $4,626
Out-of-state tuition $12,553 $6,003
School-wide earnings (10y) $40,865 $40,691
Acceptance rate Open / not reported Open / not reported
Graduation rate 39.5% 23.4%
Retention rate
Median debt $11,075 $10,506
Enrollment 1,010 1,932
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Grays Harbor College Lower Columbia College
Family income $0–30k $2,988 $6,078
Family income $30–48k $2,129 $7,069
Family income $48–75k $6,781 $9,483
Family income $75–110k $8,318 $10,482
Family income $110k+ $15,073 $14,192

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Grays Harbor College Lower Columbia College
Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studies and Humanities 34.2% 47.9%
Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing 4.2% 19.4%
Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Levels and Methods 8.7% 4.7%
Business Administration, Management and Operations 8.2% 3.3%
Mental and Social Health Services and Allied Professions 10.1% 0.7%
Practical Nursing, Vocational Nursing and Nursing Assistants 0.4% 8%
Precision Metal Working 5.7% 2.1%
Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Technologies/Technicians 5.3% 1.2%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Grays Harbor College reports the lower average net price by $2,847 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $11,388 difference over four years ($19,132 vs $30,520).

Grays Harbor College reports $174 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($40,865 vs $40,691). This is not earnings for a specific major.

Retention data is incomplete for at least one school. Compare the available graduation, debt, price and admissions context without treating a missing field as an advantage.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Grays Harbor College vs Lower Columbia College, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Grays Harbor College is cheaper — average net price $4,783 per year vs $7,630 at Lower Columbia College. The annual difference of $2,847 adds up to about $11,388 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

Grays Harbor College reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $40,865 vs $40,691 at Lower Columbia College. The gap in the federal data is $174. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.