EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Fort Peck Community College vs Montana State University Billings

Compare average net price ($400 at Fort Peck Community College; $16,524 at Montana State University Billings), ROI score (92.17 vs 6.70), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($14,747 vs $44,296), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Fort Peck Community College; Open / not reported at Montana State University Billings) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Fort Peck Community College Montana State University Billings
ROI score (school-wide) 92.17 6.70
Avg net price $400 $16,524
4-year avg net price $1,600 $66,096
In-state tuition $2,250 $7,280
Out-of-state tuition $2,250 $22,897
School-wide earnings (10y) $14,747 $44,296
Acceptance rate Open / not reported Open / not reported
Graduation rate 16.7% 30%
Retention rate 30.2% 55.6%
Median debt $18,209
Enrollment 282 2,626
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Fort Peck Community College Montana State University Billings
Family income $0–30k -$144 $13,927
Family income $30–48k $54 $14,387
Family income $48–75k $4,779 $16,749
Family income $75–110k $3,239 $18,948
Family income $110k+ $20,035

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Fort Peck Community College Montana State University Billings
Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studies and Humanities 16.9% 7.5%
Psychology, General 7.2% 4%
Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Levels and Methods 4.8% 3.8%
Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Technologies/Technicians 4.8% 3.1%
Business Administration, Management and Operations 6% 1.9%
Precision Metal Working 2.4% 1.9%
Accounting and Related Services 3.6% 0.6%
Natural Resources Conservation and Research 1.2% 0.8%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Fort Peck Community College reports the lower average net price by $16,124 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $64,496 difference over four years ($1,600 vs $66,096).

Montana State University Billings reports $29,549 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($44,296 vs $14,747). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 30.2% at Fort Peck Community College and 55.6% at Montana State University Billings. Debt data is incomplete for at least one school, so it is not used as a deciding signal here.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Fort Peck Community College vs Montana State University Billings, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Fort Peck Community College is cheaper — average net price $400 per year vs $16,524 at Montana State University Billings. The annual difference of $16,124 adds up to about $64,496 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

Montana State University Billings reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $44,296 vs $14,747 at Fort Peck Community College. The gap in the federal data is $29,549. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.