EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Crowder College vs University of Missouri-Kansas City

Compare average net price ($9,023 at Crowder College; $13,310 at University of Missouri-Kansas City), ROI score (9.97 vs 11.20), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($35,987 vs $59,637), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Crowder College; 72.2% at University of Missouri-Kansas City) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Crowder College University of Missouri-Kansas City
ROI score (school-wide) 9.97 11.20
Avg net price $9,023 $13,310
4-year avg net price $36,092 $53,240
In-state tuition $6,180 $12,587
Out-of-state tuition $8,280 $30,227
School-wide earnings (10y) $35,987 $59,637
Acceptance rate Open / not reported 72.2%
Graduation rate 49.2% 55.5%
Retention rate 58.8% 75.4%
Median debt $9,000 $18,750
Enrollment 2,570 6,817
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT 1204

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Crowder College University of Missouri-Kansas City
Family income $0–30k $8,283 $10,576
Family income $30–48k $9,223 $10,472
Family income $48–75k $8,481 $12,613
Family income $75–110k $12,560 $16,019
Family income $110k+ $13,975 $18,877

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Crowder College University of Missouri-Kansas City
Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studies and Humanities 29.6% 3.5%
Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing 9.9% 8%
Business Administration, Management and Operations 5.8% 6.1%
Business/Commerce, General 0.1% 7%
Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Subject Areas 4.1% 0.6%
Allied Health and Medical Assisting Services 3.5% 0.5%
Accounting and Related Services 0.3% 3.5%
Allied Health Diagnostic, Intervention, and Treatment Professions 1.7% 0.5%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Crowder College reports the lower average net price by $4,287 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $17,148 difference over four years ($36,092 vs $53,240).

University of Missouri-Kansas City reports $23,650 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($59,637 vs $35,987). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 58.8% at Crowder College and 75.4% at University of Missouri-Kansas City. Median federal debt among completers is $9,000 vs $18,750, respectively.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Crowder College vs University of Missouri-Kansas City, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Crowder College is cheaper — average net price $9,023 per year vs $13,310 at University of Missouri-Kansas City. The annual difference of $4,287 adds up to about $17,148 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

University of Missouri-Kansas City reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $59,637 vs $35,987 at Crowder College. The gap in the federal data is $23,650. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.