EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Central Maine Community College vs University of Maine at Fort Kent

Compare average net price ($6,975 at Central Maine Community College; $7,482 at University of Maine at Fort Kent), ROI score (15.21 vs 17.07), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($42,448 vs $51,077), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Central Maine Community College; 97.9% at University of Maine at Fort Kent) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Central Maine Community College University of Maine at Fort Kent
ROI score (school-wide) 15.21 17.07
Avg net price $6,975 $7,482
4-year avg net price $27,900 $29,928
In-state tuition $4,140 $9,420
Out-of-state tuition $7,020 $14,880
School-wide earnings (10y) $42,448 $51,077
Acceptance rate Open / not reported 97.9%
Graduation rate 30.3% 39.4%
Retention rate 56.8% 89.3%
Median debt $12,000 $20,160
Enrollment 2,952 599
Ownership Public Public
Avg SAT

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Central Maine Community College University of Maine at Fort Kent
Family income $0–30k $5,470 $8,163
Family income $30–48k $5,970 $6,130
Family income $48–75k $8,105 $4,122
Family income $75–110k $9,482 $10,020
Family income $110k+ $11,672 $11,661

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Central Maine Community College University of Maine at Fort Kent
Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing 8.3% 72.8%
Business Administration, Management and Operations 10.9% 11.6%
Liberal Arts and Sciences, General Studies and Humanities 15.8% 1.7%
Criminal Justice and Corrections 11.2% 4.3%
Computer/Information Technology Administration and Management 1.7% 1.3%
Biology, General 2% 0.9%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Central Maine Community College reports the lower average net price by $507 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $2,028 difference over four years ($27,900 vs $29,928).

University of Maine at Fort Kent reports $8,629 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($51,077 vs $42,448). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 56.8% at Central Maine Community College and 89.3% at University of Maine at Fort Kent. Median federal debt among completers is $12,000 vs $20,160, respectively.

6 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Central Maine Community College vs University of Maine at Fort Kent, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Central Maine Community College is cheaper — average net price $6,975 per year vs $7,482 at University of Maine at Fort Kent. The annual difference of $507 adds up to about $2,028 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

University of Maine at Fort Kent reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $51,077 vs $42,448 at Central Maine Community College. The gap in the federal data is $8,629. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.