Head-to-head · 2026
Cameron University vs University of Tulsa
Compare average net price ($10,912 at Cameron University; $15,000 at University of Tulsa), ROI score (9.19 vs 10.23), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($40,118 vs $61,408), and admissions context (Open / not reported at Cameron University; 61.5% at University of Tulsa) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.
| Metric | Cameron University | University of Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score (school-wide) | 9.19 | 10.23 ✓ |
| Avg net price | $10,912 ✓ | $15,000 |
| 4-year avg net price | $43,648 ✓ | $60,000 |
| In-state tuition | $7,095 | $50,061 |
| Out-of-state tuition | $16,515 | $50,061 |
| School-wide earnings (10y) | $40,118 | $61,408 ✓ |
| Acceptance rate | Open / not reported | 61.5% |
| Graduation rate | 30.7% | 72.3% ✓ |
| Retention rate | 67.2% | 92.1% ✓ |
| Median debt | $21,500 | $21,500 |
| Enrollment | 2,492 | 2,813 |
| Ownership | Public | Private Non-Profit |
| Avg SAT | — | 1389 |
Cost by family income
Reported net price by income band
Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.
| Income band | Cameron University | University of Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Family income $0–30k | $8,752 | $5,578 ✓ |
| Family income $30–48k | $10,555 | $8,616 ✓ |
| Family income $48–75k | $11,919 | $10,871 ✓ |
| Family income $75–110k | $16,504 ✓ | $18,579 |
| Family income $110k+ | $15,808 ✓ | $25,473 |
Program fit
Shared fields with reported awards
Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.
| Shared field | Cameron University | University of Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Business Administration, Management and Operations | 14.1% | 5.5% |
| Psychology, General | 7.9% | 3.5% |
| Computer Science | 1.7% | 7% |
| Sports, Kinesiology, and Physical Education/Fitness | 4.7% | 2.8% |
| Finance and Financial Management Services | 3.8% | 3.6% |
| Computer and Information Sciences, General | 7% | 0.2% |
| Accounting and Related Services | 2.7% | 4.2% |
| Biology, General | 2.7% | 2.8% |
Decision readout
What the differences mean
Cameron University reports the lower average net price by $4,088 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $16,352 difference over four years ($43,648 vs $60,000).
University of Tulsa reports $21,290 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($61,408 vs $40,118). This is not earnings for a specific major.
First-year retention is 67.2% at Cameron University and 92.1% at University of Tulsa. Median federal debt among completers is $21,500 vs $21,500, respectively.
8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.
Keep comparing
Related college comparisons
Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.
Frequently asked
Cameron University vs University of Tulsa, answered
3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Which school costs less after aid?
Cameron University is cheaper — average net price $10,912 per year vs $15,000 at University of Tulsa. The annual difference of $4,088 adds up to about $16,352 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
University of Tulsa reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $61,408 vs $40,118 at Cameron University. The gap in the federal data is $21,290. This is not major-specific earnings.
Is there an overall winner?
No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.