Head-to-head · 2026
Black Hills State University vs Southeast Technical College
Compare average net price ($15,911 at Black Hills State University; $17,400 at Southeast Technical College), ROI score (7.33 vs 6.71), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($46,674 vs $46,709), and admissions context (96.3% at Black Hills State University; Open / not reported at Southeast Technical College) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.
| Metric | Black Hills State University | Southeast Technical College |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score (school-wide) | 7.33 ✓ | 6.71 |
| Avg net price | $15,911 ✓ | $17,400 |
| 4-year avg net price | $63,644 ✓ | $69,600 |
| In-state tuition | $8,764 | $7,650 |
| Out-of-state tuition | $11,866 | $7,650 |
| School-wide earnings (10y) | $46,674 | $46,709 ✓ |
| Acceptance rate | 96.3% | Open / not reported |
| Graduation rate | 42.6% | 58.8% ✓ |
| Retention rate | 71.7% ✓ | 69.8% |
| Median debt | $26,000 | $12,000 ✓ |
| Enrollment | 1,928 | 2,310 |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
| Avg SAT | 1087 | — |
Cost by family income
Reported net price by income band
Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.
| Income band | Black Hills State University | Southeast Technical College |
|---|---|---|
| Family income $0–30k | $11,863 ✓ | $14,418 |
| Family income $30–48k | $13,379 ✓ | $15,221 |
| Family income $48–75k | $15,588 ✓ | $17,079 |
| Family income $75–110k | $18,072 ✓ | $19,425 |
| Family income $110k+ | $18,604 ✓ | $20,254 |
Program fit
Shared fields with reported awards
Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.
| Shared field | Black Hills State University | Southeast Technical College |
|---|---|---|
| Business/Commerce, General | 0.7% | 6.7% |
| Accounting and Related Services | 0.6% | 3.6% |
| Human Resources Management and Services | 2% | 0.1% |
| Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations | 0.4% | 1.2% |
Decision readout
What the differences mean
Black Hills State University reports the lower average net price by $1,489 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $5,956 difference over four years ($63,644 vs $69,600).
Southeast Technical College reports $35 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($46,709 vs $46,674). This is not earnings for a specific major.
First-year retention is 71.7% at Black Hills State University and 69.8% at Southeast Technical College. Median federal debt among completers is $26,000 vs $12,000, respectively.
4 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.
Keep comparing
Related college comparisons
Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.
Frequently asked
Black Hills State University vs Southeast Technical College, answered
3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Which school costs less after aid?
Black Hills State University is cheaper — average net price $15,911 per year vs $17,400 at Southeast Technical College. The annual difference of $1,489 adds up to about $5,956 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
Southeast Technical College reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $46,709 vs $46,674 at Black Hills State University. The gap in the federal data is $35. This is not major-specific earnings.
Is there an overall winner?
No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.