EduGradify
Menu
Find a college

Head-to-head · 2026

Auburn University at Montgomery vs Columbia Southern University

Compare average net price ($13,224 at Auburn University at Montgomery; $14,580 at Columbia Southern University), ROI score (8.39 vs 10.89), school-wide ten-year median earnings ($44,391 vs $63,534), and admissions context (91.6% at Auburn University at Montgomery; Open / not reported at Columbia Southern University) using federal College Scorecard data. The table keeps affordability, outcomes, access and program fit separate rather than declaring one universal winner.

Face to face

Metric-by-metric comparison

13 metrics, side by side. Color marks a useful directional signal; admissions, SAT, tuition eligibility, ownership and enrollment stay neutral.

Metric Auburn University at Montgomery Columbia Southern University
ROI score (school-wide) 8.39 10.89
Avg net price $13,224 $14,580
4-year avg net price $52,896 $58,320
In-state tuition $9,700 $6,760
Out-of-state tuition $20,668 $6,760
School-wide earnings (10y) $44,391 $63,534
Acceptance rate 91.6% Open / not reported
Graduation rate 32.6% 33.3%
Retention rate 67.6% 71%
Median debt $25,000 $21,339
Enrollment 2,542 12,176
Ownership Public Private For-Profit
Avg SAT 1093

Cost by family income

Reported net price by income band

Federal averages for students receiving Title IV aid. These are context, not a substitute for either school's financial-aid offer.

Income band Auburn University at Montgomery Columbia Southern University
Family income $0–30k $11,706 $12,913
Family income $30–48k $12,309 $13,455
Family income $48–75k $13,202 $15,569
Family income $75–110k $17,387 $16,226
Family income $110k+ $16,117 $17,408

Program fit

Shared fields with reported awards

Award share is the share of reported credentials in a field, not the share of currently enrolled students.

Shared field Auburn University at Montgomery Columbia Southern University
Business Administration, Management and Operations 1.9% 33%
Criminal Justice and Corrections 5.1% 7.4%
Sports, Kinesiology, and Physical Education/Fitness 5.4% 0%
Health and Medical Administrative Services 1.8% 3.6%
Computer and Information Sciences, General 3.6% 1.6%
Homeland Security 0.2% 3.6%
Public Administration 1% 2.6%
Human Resources Management and Services 0.9% 2.4%

Decision readout

What the differences mean

Auburn University at Montgomery reports the lower average net price by $1,356 per year. Holding today's averages constant, that is a $5,424 difference over four years ($52,896 vs $58,320).

Columbia Southern University reports $19,143 higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry ($63,534 vs $44,391). This is not earnings for a specific major.

First-year retention is 67.6% at Auburn University at Montgomery and 71% at Columbia Southern University. Median federal debt among completers is $25,000 vs $21,339, respectively.

8 of the strongest shared fields with positive award-share data are listed below. Award share describes reported credentials in a field, not the percentage of currently enrolled students.

Keep comparing

Promoted matchups involving the same colleges or other leading schools in their states.

Frequently asked

Auburn University at Montgomery vs Columbia Southern University, answered

3 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.

Which school costs less after aid?

Auburn University at Montgomery is cheaper — average net price $13,224 per year vs $14,580 at Columbia Southern University. The annual difference of $1,356 adds up to about $5,424 over four years.

Which school reports higher earnings?

Columbia Southern University reports higher school-wide median earnings ten years after entry: $63,534 vs $44,391 at Auburn University at Montgomery. The gap in the federal data is $19,143. This is not major-specific earnings.

Is there an overall winner?

No single metric makes either school the universal winner. Compare your actual aid offers, residency tuition, intended major, graduation and retention rates, debt, location and campus fit. EduGradify keeps these trade-offs separate instead of combining admissions selectivity and test scores into a final verdict.